LuisCypher53@gmail.com I am not a law firm. I am an indivudual challenging a color of law racketeering enterprise that operates out of state probate courts dedicated to 3^rd party theft of family generational assets as a color of law racketeering enterprise.

The color-of-law interception (theft) of family generational asset transfers is a serious organized crime industry operating out of state probate courts. The variety and number of schemes and artifice employed vary according to the case. I call the case in point “Grift of the Brunstings”. These are the kinds of things one will find slithering in the sludge that congeals at the bottom of the cesspool of human moral depravity! GRIFT OF THE BRUNSTING’S a law fo=ir
Ashkenazim Attorney Stephen A. Mendel Bar Card Number: 13930650 TX License Date: 11/06/1987 The Mendel Law Firm, L.P. 1155 Dairy Ashford, Suite 104 Houston 77079 United States (US) Phone: (281) 759-3213 Fax: 281-759-3214	Attorney Bobbie G. Bayless Bar Card Number: 01940600 TX License Date: 05/26/1980 Bayless and Stokes Houston Office 2931 Ferndale Street Houston, Texas 77098 Phone: 713-522-2224 Fax 713-522-2218
Estate Planning Bait and Switch grifter Attorney Candace L. Kunz-Freed Bar Card Number: 24041282 TX License Date: 11/06/2003 9545 Katy Freeway, Suite 400, Houston, Texas 77024 713-467-1060	Estate Planning Bait and Switch Grifter Attorney Bernard Lisle Mathews III State Bar of Texas ID Number: 13187450 Former Staff Attorney with Vacek & Freed
Ashkenazim Attorney Neal Even Spielman Bar Card Number: 00794678 TX License Date: 11/03/1995 Griffin and Mathews 1155 Dairy Ashford Suite 300 Houston, Texas 77079 Phone: 281-870-1124 Fax: 281-870-1647	Attorney Corey S. Reed Thompson Coe State Bar No. 24032085 4400 Post Oak Parkway Suite 1000 Houston, TX 77027 713-403-8213 creed@thompsoncoe.com
Gregory Albert Lester Esq. Eligible to Practice in Texas Bar Card Number: 12235700 TX License Date: 11/02/1984 Primary Practice Location: Houston , Texas PO Box 79766 Houston, TX 77279-9766 Practice Areas: Wills-Trusts-Probate	Anita Brunsting Wannabe Family Inheritance Thief 203 Bloomingdale Circle Victoria, Texas 77904
Mr. Jason Bradley Ostrom Deceased Bar Card Number: 24027710 TX License Date: 11/01/2000 Primary Practice Location: Houston , Texas Practice Areas: Litigation: Commercial, Real Estate, Wills-Trusts-Probate Statutory Profile Last Certified On: 01/29/2021	Christine Riddle Butts Former Judge Harris County Probate Court No. 4 Riddle & Butts, LLP Bar Card Number: 24004222 TX License Date: 12/11/1997 Primary Practice Location: Houston , Texas 8777 W Rayford Rd Spring, TX 77389-5187
Ms. L. Darlene Payne Smith Eligible to Practice in Texas Crain, Caton & James, P.C. dsmith@craincaton.com Bar Card Number: 18643525 TX License Date: 11/06/1987 Primary Practice Location: Houston , Texas 1401 McKinney St Ste 1700 Houston, TX 77010-4037	Clarinda Comstock Harris County Probate Court No. Four 201 Caroline St Fl 7 Houston, TX 77002-1901 Bar Card Number: 00790492
INTRODUCTION Every year millions upon millions of dollars are stolen in staged litigation schemes devised with the sole purpose of generating fraudulent bills for alleged attorney’s fees. In the process of such schemes, unsuspecting citizens are being pulled into a vortex of litigation posturing, disguised as legitimate court proceedings. The result is financial and emotional devastation for the victims and unjust enrichment for the color-of-law predators. A key battleground, well known for such staged litigation schemes, are the state probate courts. The dot com revolution generated great wealth and we, as a nation, are in the midst of the largest transfer of family generational wealth in our history. We are talking about trillions of dollars annually. Let that sink in. The objective of the probate mafia is to intercept (steal) family generational asset transfers using a cookie cutter system in order to minimizing the work while maximizing the return on investment. The problem confronting victims is where to find remedy. In probate, the heirs are held in stasis (hostage) while the attorneys pose and posture, making threats while manufacturing unnecesasry attorneys fees. In the end the fees are so large the family has to submit to the only avenue of escape, a settlement agreement (contract) that is always under terms drafted by the predators themselves. Every estate planning and asset protection services provider will tell you that a pour-over will, with independent administration devising solely to your living trust, will spare you the horror of guardianship protection and spare your children from suffering the well known horrors the probate courts have been known to offer. The legal and equitable theories are generally sound. The problem is in getting judges and attorneys to burden themselves with the law when they are clothed in self-manufactured doctrines of impunity, having everything to gain and nothing to lose.
Federal Civil RICO Complaint with Memorandum and Exhibits A Consolidated Complaint for Damages Exhibits Folder B Exhibits List C Summation of Exhibits Relevance D Financial Distribution Breakdown E Memorandum on Voidness of Probate Orders 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 1651 F Memorandum on Trust Instument Validity	Pleading Civil Racketeering One does not have a claim for civil RICO without substantial evidence of criminal RICO. The necessary pleading elements for a racketeering claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1962, based on the principles stated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal 556 U.S. 662 (2009) • 129 S. Ct. 1937 • 173 L. Ed. 2d 868 • 73 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 837 and Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly 550 U.S. 544 (2007) • 127 S. Ct. 1955 • 167 L. Ed. 2d 929, are as follows: Existence of an Enterprise: o The plaintiff must allege the existence of an "enterprise" engaged in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce. o The enterprise must be distinct from the individual defendants. Pattern of Racketeering Activity: o The plaintiff must allege a "pattern" of racketeering activity, which includes at least two predicate acts of racketeering within a 10-year period. o Predicate acts must be specified and supported with factual allegations (e.g., mail fraud, wire fraud, etc.). Connection to the Enterprise: o The plaintiff must show how the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise's affairs through the pattern of racketeering activity. Causal Nexus: o The plaintiff must demonstrate a causal connection between the defendant's racketeering activity and the harm suffered. Specificity in Allegations: o 1. **Plausibility Standard**: The complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim that is plausible on its face. Mere conclusory statements or a formulaic recitation of elements are insufficient. (See [Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) o 2. **Specificity in Allegations**: The complaint must include factual allegations that allow the court to draw a reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. This requires more than a sheer possibility of unlawful conduct. (See [Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) o 3. **Pattern of Racketeering Activity**: The plaintiff must allege at least two predicate acts of racketeering activity within a ten-year period, showing a pattern of related and continuous criminal conduct. o 4. **Distinctness**: The alleged "enterprise" must be distinct from the "person" accused of racketeering activity. o 5. **Causation and Injury**: The complaint must demonstrate a causal link between the alleged racketeering activity and the injury suffered by the plaintiff. o 6. **Agreement for Conspiracy Claims**: For RICO conspiracy claims, the plaintiff must plausibly allege an agreement to commit the predicate acts and achieve the unlawful objectives of the enterprise. These elements must be supported by factual allegations that go beyond speculative or conclusory assertions, ensuring the claims are grounded in plausible, specific details.